BitBucket vs Git


Click Here And Get This Posted To YOU In PDF Format

BitBucket vs Git

Difference Between BitBucket vs Git

BitBucket vs Git, BitBucket is a web-based version control system. BitBucket was launched in 2008. Maintained by the Atlassian. We use command line commands to interact with the local repository, before making the changes in the code we make the copy in the local machine and commit it in the local machine then interact with the remote repository and push the changed files into it. The Push, pull and clone etc., of source data, can be done either by command line command or by the Source tree GUI.

Git is installed and maintained on our local systems rather than the cloud. Git is a distributed version control system. While GitHub is a cloud-based hosting service. Git was first developed in 2005. It is a version control system. Maintained by the LINUX Foundation. It is a Primary command-line tool. To interact with the Git repository that has been installed in desktop we need a GUI (Graphical user interface) named “GIT GUI”

Head to Head Comparison Between BitBucket vs Git (Infographics)

Below are top 10 comparison between BitBucket and Git

BitBucket vs Git info

Key Differences between BitBucket and Git

Now let us check the key differences between Bitbucket and Git:

Bit bucket is a Web-based version control system. The developer of the Bitbucket is Jesper Noehr. Written in Python. It provides web services for the Git repository. The source tree is used for the push, pull, and cloning of the data. Used in web-based. Fastest and efficient compared to GitHub.

Git is a distributed version control system. Developed by the Linux Torvalds. Currently Junio has become the developer of the GIT. Written in C, shell, pearl, Tcl, and Python. It is a distributed version control system used for the tracking of changes made in the source code. Push, pull and the clone has a syntax written in the command line. Command-line is used in git. It can be overcomplicated sometimes.

BitBucket vs Git Comparison Table

Below tables compare the BitBucket and GIT in the features perspective. Let us have a brief look at the same:

Features

BitBucket

Git

Installation
Installation is done on the control system
Installation is done on Local Machine (Locally)

Release
Launched in 2008
The very first release was done in 2005.

Maintained by
Atlassian
LINUX foundation

GUI/Command line
we make the copy in the local machine and commit it in the local machine then interact with the remote repository and push the changed files into it. The Push, pull and clone etc., of source data, can be done either by command line command or by the Source tree GUI.
Command-line commands are used.

Open-source
It is not an open-source
It is an Open Source

Continuous Integration
Continuous Integration is done in BitBucket. (yes)
Git is not a Continuous Integration tool. (No)

Continuous Delivery
Continuous Delivery is done in BitBucket.
Git is not a continuous delivery tool.

Integration in Jira
Integration in Jira is done in BitBucket.
Integration in Jira is not done in Git.

Competition with companies
Bitbucket is having a competition with GitHub in real-time.
Git is having a competition with Mercurial, Subversion, IBM, etc.,

Companies using technology
Some of the companies that use BitBucket in their companies PayPal, Salesforce, CircleCI, and Starbucks, etc.
Some of the companies that use Git in their companies Netflix, Reddit, Lyft and Shopify, etc.,

Conclusion

BitBucket is a web-based version control system. We use command line commands to interact with the local repository, before making the changes in the code we make the copy in the local machine and commit it in the local machine then interact with the remote repository and push the changed files into it. The Push, pull and clone etc., of source data, can be done either by command line command or by the Source tree GUI. Built-in user management. Git is installed and maintained on our local systems rather than the cloud. The user management feature is not used in GIT. It is a fully distributed version control system. All have their branches to work on. Merging will take place only when the Branch owner approves the change. The cloned repository that we take in git act as a full backup of the repository.

Recommended Articles

This is a guide to BitBucket vs Git. Here we discuss an introduction to the difference between BitBucket vs Git, key differences, and comparison table. You can also go through our other related articles to learn more –

GitHub Alternatives
Grafana vs Kibana
Git Fetch vs Git Pull
What is Git Fetch?

The post BitBucket vs Git appeared first on EDUCBA.

Read more: educba.com

What's Your Reaction?

Cry Cry
0
Cry
Cute Cute
0
Cute
Damn Damn
0
Damn
Dislike Dislike
0
Dislike
Like Like
0
Like
Lol Lol
0
Lol
Love Love
0
Love
Win Win
0
Win
WTF WTF
0
WTF

Comments 0

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

BitBucket vs Git

log in

Become a part of our community!

Captcha!
Don't have an account?
sign up

reset password

Back to
log in

sign up

Join BoomBox Community

Captcha!
Back to
log in
Choose A Format
Personality quiz
Trivia quiz
Poll
Story
List
Open List
Ranked List
Meme
Video
Audio
Image